The 2023 Hollywood strikes ended with new residual structures for streaming: the Writers Guild of America won a success-based bonus for high-budget streaming shows watched by at least 20 percent of a platform's domestic subscribers, and SAG-AFTRA secured a viewership-backed bonus fund starting at 40 million dollars annually. The WGA struck for 148 days from May 2 to September 27, 2023, and SAG-AFTRA for 118 days from July 14 to November 9, 2023, the longest combined shutdown since the 1960s.
What was the residual system before streaming?
Residuals are payments for reuse beyond the original release, and under the legacy television model they scaled mechanically with success. When a series was sold into syndication and rerun in markets around the world, writers and actors received payments per reuse, and a long-running hit could pay its creators for decades. The system tied compensation to observable, third-party transactions: a rerun aired, a foreign market licensed, a payment followed.
Streaming broke the mechanism. When a platform licenses a series for its own subscription service, the old reuse triggers largely stop firing, and the subscription-era residual formulas that replaced them paid flat amounts per subscriber threshold that did not distinguish a modest title from a phenomenon. Writers and actors argued, throughout 2023, that a show streamed by tens of millions earned residuals little different from one nobody finished, and performers' accounts of streaming residual checks for famous series, shared publicly during the strikes, became the dispute's defining evidence.
What did the WGA agreement change?
The contract ratified in October 2023 created a success-based residual for high-budget streaming programs: if at least 20 percent of a platform's domestic subscribers watch a qualifying series within its first 90 days of release, or over similar windows in later years, writers receive an additional payment of a specified percentage of the fixed residual, an explicit re-linking of pay to audience. Alongside it, the deal raised minimums by 5, 4 and 3.5 percent across the contract years, established minimum staffing and duration for writers rooms, and set the agreement's AI terms: writers may use AI if the company consents, company-required AI output cannot reduce writer credit or compensation, and AI-generated material cannot serve as source material on its own.
What did the SAG-AFTRA agreement change?
The performers' deal, ratified in December 2023, raised minimums by 7 percent immediately, with further increases in later years, and created a streaming bonus fund starting at 40 million dollars in the first year, growing with subscriber gains, paid to performers on streaming projects whose viewing exceeds defined thresholds. Its most discussed provisions concerned AI: employers must obtain consent to create and use digital replicas of performers, must compensate for their use, and the contract set protections around scans and the reuse of likenesses, the issues that had prolonged the final weeks of negotiation.
| Provision | WGA 2023 | SAG-AFTRA 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Strike length | 148 days, May 2 to Sept 27 | 118 days, July 14 to Nov 9 |
| Minimum increases | 5%, 4%, 3.5% | 7% then further steps |
| Streaming success pay | Bonus at 20% subscriber viewership | Bonus fund from $40M yearly |
| AI terms | Consent and credit protections | Consent and compensation for replicas |
What did the strikes cost?
The stoppage's economic effects were documented across Southern California: state economists attributed billions in lost output to the combined strikes, thousands of below-the-line workers in crafts not represented by either union went months without sets to work on, and production schedules pushed into 2024 created a compressed, backlogged release calendar whose effects on supply ran through 2025. The California film-tax-credit expansion that followed in 2024 was framed in Sacramento partly as strike recovery.
What is the legacy as of early 2026?
The durable change is conceptual: streaming pay now scales, however imperfectly, with audience. The 20-percent threshold and the bonus fund are narrower than the syndication economics they echo, and both reward only the largest-performing titles, but they re-established the principle that reuse value belongs partly to the people who made the work. The AI provisions became the template every later negotiation, in Hollywood and beyond, has referenced, and the performers' consent-and-compensation structure for digital replicas remains the standard other industries cite.
The second legacy is leverage. Both unions demonstrated that a full production shutdown was survivable for their memberships and costly for the studios, and the 2023 cycle's pattern, unified demands, long duration, material gains, now sits in every future negotiation as precedent. The companies' counter-lesson was recorded in their own statements and filings: content spend discipline, faster scheduling and, from 2024 onward, a wave of further corporate consolidation that reshaped the studio sector before the next contracts were negotiated.
All dates and figures in this explainer are drawn from the ratified 2023 agreements and contemporaneous coverage; subsequent negotiations may have amended specific terms, and the structures described are those settled at the strikes' end.
How did the strikes change what audiences saw?
The immediate visible effect was absence. With scripts frozen from May 2023 and sets shut from July, fall 2023 schedules filled with unscripted formats, international acquisitions and repurposed cable catalogs, while scripted series that had been mid-production sat unfinished for months. The 2024 calendar then absorbed the backlog in a compressed order that left quieter release weeks and glutted ones, a pattern the industry attributed directly to strike recovery. Some series never returned at all: networks and platforms weighing restart costs against projected engagement cancelled a wave of modest performers whose economics no longer cleared, a continuation of the cost discipline that had partly provoked the strikes in the first place. Late-night television returned earliest, under interim agreements, and became the strikes' running commentary; film release dates slid in dominoes through 2024 and 2025, with a handful of event titles moved nearly two years from their original slots. By 2026 the supply pipeline had largely normalized, but the composition of output, fewer mid-budget scripts, more franchise-adjacent and internationally financed projects, still reflects choices made during and immediately after the shutdown, which is the sense in which the strikes are legible not only in contracts but in the release schedule itself.
What remains unresolved?
Plenty, by both sides' acknowledgment. The success thresholds reward only top-performing titles, leaving mid-tier streaming shows on the old flat residual footing. Digital-replica consent rules govern named performers while broader synthetic-media uses evolve faster than any contract cycle. The bonus fund's growth formula ties performer upside to subscriber counts at a moment when ad-supported tiers and password-sharing crackdowns are changing what subscriber counts mean. And the next negotiation rounds, beginning with the industry's changed studio map, will test whether 2023's leverage pattern repeats in a colder spending climate. Those open questions are the story's forward edge, and this explainer deliberately stops at what the ratified agreements and dated coverage establish: what was struck for, what was won, and what the record shows about the first full renegotiation of Hollywood's deal with streaming.
For more context, read When games cross over into entertainment.
For more context, read short-form video music discovery.
For more context, read Creators on the red carpet press line.